cima cimapro19 cs3 1 practice test

Answer:

Complete
your answer and
submit.

Answer:

Complete
your answer and
submit.

Answer:

Complete
your answer and
submit.

Answer:

Complete
your answer and
submit.

Answer:

Complete
your answer and
submit.

Answer:

Complete
your answer and
submit.

Answer:

Complete
your answer and
submit.

Answer:

Complete
your answer and
submit.

Answer:

Complete
your answer and
submit.

Answer:

Complete
your answer and
submit.

Explanation:
Topic 2, Slide Company
Pre-seen case study
You are a senior Finance Manager who works for the Slide Group (‘Slide’). You report directly to the
parent company’s Board and advise on special projects and strategic matters. You have compiled the
following facts about the company.
Slide – company background
Slide was founded in 1954 by Henry Jones. His family owned a large piece of land on a Caribbean
Island and a chance discovery revealed the possibility of oil deposits under that land. The family
registered Slide as a company to raise finance in order to explore this opportunity and the
subsequent find exceeded all expectations.
The success of this first venture encouraged the Jones family, who owned 75% of Slide’s equity
shares at that time, to purchase oil exploration rights and to conduct exploratory drilling. The
company soon developed considerable expertise in the successful purchase and exploitation of
exploration rights.
Henry Jones’ family lived in Kayland, a European country. Slide was listed on Kayland’s stock
exchange in 1965. Henry Jones was Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Slide until 1976. He was replaced
by his son, Michael, who served as CEO until 1998. Michael’s nephew, Andrew Jones, took over and
continues as CEO.
Over the years, the ownership interest of the founding family has declined. Some of their shares
were placed on the stock exchange when the company was first listed. Since then, various holdings
have been sold. By 2015, Andrew Jones retained 10% of the issued equity and a further 8% was
retained by a number of other relatives.
Fouce Oil, an Asian company based in Country C and listed on C’s stock market, purchased 25% of
Slide’s equity in 2010. At the time, Fouce Oil made a formal public announcement that it would not
purchase further equity shares in Slide. In response to this assurance, Fouce Oil has the right to select
two Non-executive Directors to serve on Slide’s Board.
The Slide Group has wholly owned subsidiaries operating in seven countries around the world. Each
subsidiary is responsible for acquiring oil exploration rights in its host country and arranging for the
necessary work to be undertaken in order to explore for oil.
Kayland’s home currency is the K$.
The oil industry operates on a global basis and virtually all transactions are priced in terms of United
States Dollar (USD). Strategic case study exam – May 2015 – pre-seen materials
3 ©CIMA 2015. No reproduction without prior consent
Oil Exploration
Crude oil is created by natural processes. Organic matter that is trapped underground and
compressed while it decomposes can form pools of crude oil over a period of millions of years. The
time taken for oil to be created through this process means that it is effectively irreplaceable once it
has been extracted and consumed.
Natural gas is formed by the same process. Oil wells often have a pocket of gas trapped above the
well. The pressure from the gas can be used to force oil to the surface once a well has been drilled
into the rock.
Natural gas can be collected and distributed as a fuel or it can sometimes be regarded as a by-
product of oil.
The process of searching for oil requires an understanding of geology. Geologists have discovered
that certain types of rock formations are associated with the presence of oil. Geologists conduct
surveys that include the analysis of the fossils that can indicate that an area was once rich in the
plant and animal life that could have provided the organic matter required for the creation of oil.
Oil fields can be discovered on land or under the sea. Exploration and drilling for oil is possible in
either setting, with each offering its own challenges.
If an oil company believes that an area is worth exploring then it must seek permission from the
owner of the mineral rights, who is not necessarily the owner of that land or stretch of water at
surface level. In some countries the government owns all mineral rights. In other countries it is
possible for the surface land and the mineral rights to be owned by different people or entities.
Mineral rights at sea generally belong to governments. The law relating to ownership of minerals
under the sea can be complicated and national rights can be a matter for international law, with
some countries’ rights extending hundreds of miles from the shoreline and others being quite
restricted.


Onshore oil drilling rig
Oil companies often supplement the geological surveys with seismic surveys. These involve creating
a loud bang by generating a small explosive charge. The resulting sound waves penetrate the rock
layer and create echoes, which are recorded for detailed analysis. The echoes can indicate a great
deal about the conditions under the rock, including the possible presence of oil.

Seismic survey ship
Ultimately, the only way to ensure that there are exploitable quantities of oil in a particular site is to
drill an exploratory well. On land, this would involve building a drilling rig in place. At
sea, this would require the use of a special ship or drilling rig that would be anchored in place during
drilling operations. Drilling is always expensive and there is always a risk that the well will either turn
out to be dry or to contain too little oil to be worth extracting.
The viability of an oil well can be affected by the price of oil. When oil prices rise it can become
financially viable to spend more on extraction and transportation from a well that was previously
classed as marginal or even unproductive.
If suitable oil reserves are found then the drilling rig is replaced by a production rig that is equipped
to bring the oil to the surface and to pipe it to storage tanks or pipelines so that it can be collected
and taken to the refinery.
Crude oil must usually be refined before it can be used. The only major exception being that some
oil-fired electrical power stations can burn crude oil as fuel.

Oil refinery
Crude oil is a mixture of different grades of hydrocarbon. These can range from light and volatile
fractions such as aviation fuel and petrol to heavier fluids such as diesel fuel and lubricants right
down to heavy tars and bitumen. Refining involves separating crude oil into these different grades.
Each oil field has its own unique mixture of different fractions, which affects the price.
For historical reasons, quantities of oil are measured in terms of ‘barrels’. A barrel of oil is equivalent
to 42 US gallons, which is roughly 159 litres. This measure dates from the times when oil was shipped
in barrels, but this is no longer the case with the advent of pipelines and tankers.
The following information is extracted from Slide’s corporate website:
Slide’s business strategy
The oil industry distinguishes ‘upstream’ activity from ‘midstream’ and ‘downstream’.
Upstream activities involve exploring for oil or gas and bringing potentially productive wells into
production.
Midstream activities deal with the transportation of oil or gas to the refinery.
Downstream activities comprise the refining of the oil or the purifying of the gas and its subsequent
distribution and sale to customers.
Slide’s principal interest is in upstream activities. The company employs a number of leading experts
in identifying suitable opportunities for the detection of exploitable oil reserves. It has developed its
own models for the discovery of oil in areas that were previously considered to be of limited interest.
As a result, Slide often operates in areas where there is limited competition for exploration rights.
Slide is also good at finding ways to exploit marginal wells that other companies would regard as
potentially unprofitable.
Once Slide has brought a well to production then it will sell the resulting crude oil downstream, but it
tends to sell most of its oil wells so that it can release resources from operational wells and
concentrate on fresh discoveries. Slide views its strengths as being upstream and so it leaves the
midstream and downstream aspects of the industry to larger and more general oil companies.
Slide normally buys exploration rights to investigate on its own account. Slide also makes use of the
arrangements to farm-out or farm-in exploration rights.
Farming-in and farming-out are common practices in the oil exploration industry. An oil company can
farm-out by granting another company an agreed share of the revenues from a well. It may do so in
return for a cash payment, but it is also quite common for the counterparty to this arrangement to
offer a particular service instead, such as agreeing to conduct the seismic survey of the area. This
means that both companies share the risks. The farm-out arrangement also means that there is less
need to fund the costs of exploring and so cash flow is maintained.
A company might decide to farm-in as a speculative venture in order to participate in a successful
exploration, or it may offer to farm-in on condition that the primary owner makes use of facilities
that it owns, such as infrastructure to support exploration or midstream activities. For example, the
company that decides to farm-in may make it a condition that the venture uses a particular
subcontractor, in whom it has an interest, to provide the drilling equipment.
Oil companies often rely heavily on specialist subcontractors to supply equipment and operators.
That may be because some companies operate in a variety of remote locations and it is cheaper to
lease equipment that is already in that geographical region. There can also be a need for specialist
skills in operating in particular climatic conditions or on particular geological structures.
Slide’s strategy
Slide’s main strategic priority is to maintain market dominance and become the world leader in oil
exploration. The company requires continuing investment in new technology and in skilled
employees.
Slides’ directors have prepared the following outline SWOT analysis:

Mission
Slide aspires to become the most successful oil exploration company in the world, while contributing
to the wellbeing of people and the environment.
Slide’s strategic objectives for 2014/15 are:
Deliver a sustainable business
Focus on exploration led growth
Continue to investigate areas for fracking overseas
Complete 2015 operations safely and without significant negative environmental impact
Maintain a balanced portfolio
Hold a balanced asset portfolio
Maintain strong financial statements
Seek growth
Continue to investigate areas for exploration and diversification
Our Goals
Summary of 2014/15 goals:
Deliver a sustainable business
Preserve cash for future investments
Maintain a balanced portfolio
Grow the reserves and resources base to provide the funding for future growth and cash flow
Seek operational excellence
Continue to improve on our operational efficiency

Fracking
Shale rock is found deep underground. This rock contains natural gases and crude oil. Advances in
technology over the last ten years have meant that this oil and gas can be extracted from deep
underground, even if the shale rock is in a populated area, including formations that extend
underneath towns.
In the USA more than a quarter of all gas production comes from shale rock.
Extracting these minerals involves a process called ‘fracking’. Fracking breaks up the shale rock,
which releases the oil and gas. Water mixed with sand and chemicals is forced into the rock so that
the oil and gas can seep out and be collected.
The oil and gas industry has dismissed claims that fracking is bad for the environment, although it is
unlikely that the effects of the process are fully understood. One concern is the volume of water
which is required in order to force the water mixture through the rock, another is whether the whole
process could affect the stability of the surrounding rock. The oil and gas companies themselves
admit in their annual reports that fracking is associated with risks of leaks, spills, explosions and
environmental damage.
Widespread use of fracking has reduced the pressure on the USA to import oil and gas. Gas prices, in
particular, fell in the USA over the past decade. The price of oil has taken longer to respond to this
new source, but recent decreases in oil prices have been attributed in part to the flow of shale oil. Oil
and gas from this source has been a huge source of revenue in the USA.
Kayland’s government has been reluctant to allow widespread fracking due to uncertainty over the
long term effects, but is interested in the potential revenue stream that could be obtained if fracking
was successful. There have been protests outside the offices of many of the larger oil and gas
companies because environmentalists claim that the ecosystem is being damaged by fracking and
that the long term effects are unknown. However, Kayland’s government has issued some licenses in
recent months to large oil and gas exploration companies.
Oil and Gas Reserves
The most commonly accepted definitions of oil reserves are based on those approved by the oil
industry in 2007. There are two major classifications of reserves: proven and unproven.
Proven Reserves
Proven reserves are those reserves claimed to have a reasonable certainty, at least 90% confidence,
of being recoverable under existing economic and political conditions, with existing technology.
Industry specialists refer to this as “P90” or “1P”.
Unproven reserves
Unproven reserves are based on the same type of geological data that are used to estimate proven
reserves. However there are technical, contractual, or regulatory uncertainties that prevent the
reserves being classified as proven. Unproven reserves are useful for oil companies for future
planning purposes. There are two classifications for unproven reserves, probable and possible.
Probable reserves are reserves which have a 50% confidence level of recovery. The oil industry refers
to them as "P50" as they have a 50% certainty of being produced or 2P (proven plus probable).
Possible reserves are reserves that have a less likely chance of being recovered than probable
reserves. These reserves usually have at least a 10% certainty of being produced and are known as
"P10" or “3P” (proven plus probable plus possible). Two of the reasons that reserves could be
classified as possible are geologists not agreeing on the likelihood of oil and reserves not able to be
produced at a commercial rate.
By definition, a reserve must meet four criteria:
1. Discovered – one or more exploratory wells must have been drilled to confirm that oil is actually
present.
2. Recoverable – there must be sufficient oil present to make extraction a realistic possibility.
3. Commercial – there should be a firm intention to extract the oil, thereby indicating that it can be
recovered and transported from its present location.
4. Remaining – remaining reserves are technically capable of extraction and their potential extraction
is deemed profitable.
For example, it would be possible to be certain that there is a reservoir of oil in a particular location,
but for that oil to be inaccessible using current technology or it could be accessible, but the cost of
recovery could be excessive for the quantity of oil.
Accumulations that are known, but that cannot be recovered because of commercial considerations
are known as ‘contingent resources’ and are not included in reserves.
Accumulations that are thought to exist and to be potentially recoverable but that have yet to be
discovered are known as ‘prospective resources’.





Slide’s corporate social responsibility statement
Protecting the environment is a key issue for Slide. Slide is an enthusiastic supporter of sustainable
development in the oil and gas industry. Slide is determined to use natural resources efficiently while
reducing carbon emissions in order to minimise the impact on the environment while still meeting
demand for energy.
Climate change and the protection of the environment continue to be among key sustainable
development issues in the oil and gas industry. The industry is focused on efficient use of natural
resources, the reduction of carbon emissions, and mitigating the impact on the environment while
meeting the world’s growing energy needs.
We are concerned that oil leakage and seepage can affect people, wildlife and fish near our sites and
work hard to reduce the risks to them. We constantly monitor the environment close to our sites and
take immediate action if there are traces of oil found in the surrounding area. We have reduced the
number of instances of this problem and last year were pleased to note there were no reported oil
leaks caused by our exploration or extraction that required treatment. We are proud of our
reputation in the oil industry for caring for the environment.
Carbon emissions are a huge concern for Slide and we make efforts to report these in our annual
report and to reduce them each year. We have spent over K$5 million on a new data collection
system which will enable us to more accurately measure carbon emissions.
Many of the processes utilised in extraction and production use water which is a scarce resource in
many countries. In order to avoid depleting this resource we have taken steps to ensure, whenever
possible, that we recycle water and use that in our processes. We also support a charity which helps
to provide fresh water in rural areas in some of the areas of the world most affected by water
shortages. We provide expert advice from our engineers and geologists as well as practical assistance
and donations.
Slide is most concerned for the health and safety of the workforce and others who live close enough
to be affected by our processes. We are constantly looking at the health and safety risks and
updating our mitigation procedures to reduce accidents and increase our response to them. This is
one of our highest priority risks as extraction and exploration is carried out in remote areas which
can be difficult to reach. We have spent over K$10 million on training for medical and rescue teams
in order to ensure assistance is available for both minor and major issues. Strategic case study exam –
May 2015 – pre-seen materials
16 ©CIMA 2015. No reproduction without prior consent
Slide’s Board of Directors
Andrew Jones, Chief Executive Officer
Andrew is a member of the founder’s family and took over the position in 1998.
Andrew is an Oil and Gas Engineer with a Masters degree in Oil and Gas Engineering. He also has a
Master in Business Administration degree from a well-known university in the United States.
Andrew has been credited with driving the company forward to explore for oil in very remote areas
with great success.
William Seaton, Finance Director
William has been the Finance Director for six years.
William is an accountancy graduate and is a professionally qualified accountant. He has held senior
positions in accounting and finance at two oil exploration companies and was the Finance Director of
a large oil company in Africa before he joined Slide as Finance Director.
Vickram De, Director of Innovation
Vickram serves as Director of Innovation and has held this position for two years.
Vickram has a Master of Science degree in Geology and Oil Engineering Design.
Vickram has introduced many innovative ideas for oil extraction which have helped Slide become a
leader in innovative practices in the oil industry. His techniques have enabled Slide to buy
unproductive wells from other oil companies cheaply and use Vickram’s system of pumping water at
high pressure into dormant wells to force oil to the surface. His techniques are widely used in the
industry now but he has improved them significantly lately so we are still the leader in the field.
Wilma Descouteau, Extraction Director
Wilma has been Slide’s Extraction Director since 2008. She has a PhD in Oil and Gas Engineering. She
was a senior Project Manager in several large extraction projects over a period of eight years. She
was a Project Manager with a large French refinery for the previous five years and before that
worked in oil extraction projects in the North Sea off the shores of Scotland for six years.
Victor Bogdanovitch, Exploration Director
Victor Bogdanovitch has been Slide’s Exploration Director for four years. Victor has a Master of
Geology degree from a major Russian university. He worked in oil exploration in Siberia for ten years
before he joined Slide in 2007.
Victor joined Slide to look for potential exploration sites as he had been successful in his previous
company and had successfully managed a significant project to explore and extract oil off Siberia. He
was made a Director after finding and managing a successful site with huge proven reserves for Slide
in 2009. Strategic case study exam – May 2015 – pre-seen materials
17 ©CIMA 2015. No reproduction without prior consent
James Peterson – Non-executive Chairman
James Peterson has been Slide’s Non-executive Chairman since 2013. He was previously Chief
Executive of a major Public Relations company. He has served as Human Resource Director of two
other quoted companies during his long and successful career.
James has a Master of Arts degree in Human Resources and Sociology.
James chairs both the Audit and Remuneration Committees.
Sunny Tang – Non-executive Director
Sunny has no experience of the oil industry but has been a successful Finance Director for two media
companies for over twenty years.
He is a qualified accountant and has been a Non-executive Director of Slide for two years.
He sits on both the Nomination and Remuneration Committees.
Anne Taylor – Non-executive Director
Anne Taylor has been a Non-executive Director since 2013. She has a background in human resource
management and has held senior managerial positions with a number of companies in a variety of
industries.
Anne sits on both the Nomination and Remuneration committees.
Sanje Lee – Non-executive Director
Sanje Lee has been a Non-executive Director since 2011. He has had a long career in the petroleum
industry. He served as Director of Technical Operations in Fouce for five years before Fouce asked him
to become a Non-executive Director of Slide.
Sanje moved to Kayland upon his appointment as a Non-executive Director.
Sanje has a Master of Science degree in Petroleum Technology and a Master of Business
Administration degree.
Sanje sits on both the Audit and Remuneration Committees.
Dina Viraj – Non-executive Director
Dina has been a Non-executive Director since 2010. She was previously on the Board of Fouce, and
has been selected by Fouce to be a Non-executive Director of Slide. Dina has a Doctorate in Oil and
Gas Geology and worked in the field for 15 years.
Dina moved to Kayland upon her appointment as a Non-executive Director. Strategic case study exam
– May 2015 – pre-seen materials
18 ©CIMA 2015. No reproduction without prior consent
Directors’ remuneration
The Remuneration Committee comprises James Peterson, Sunny Tang, Anne Taylor and Sanje Lee.
The committee met six times during the financial year ended 31 December 2014.
All Executive Directors receive an annual salary that is intended to be competitive in order to attract
and retain suitable Board members. The salary level is decided by the Remuneration Committee,
taking account of each individual’s role and experience and the comparable rates offered for
equivalent positions. Annual salary increases are generally in line with those offered to employees in
general, although there is scope for a more substantial increase in order to reflect any additional
responsibilities.
Executive Directors also participate in an annual bonus scheme, again administered by the
Remuneration Committee. The total bonus payable is capped at 100% of annual salary. The actual
level of bonus awarded is determined by a combination of collective and individual factors.
The collective factors are based upon achievement as measured in terms of Slide’s key KPIs:
Exploration targets, such as meeting drilling targets
Development and production targets
Health and safety
The remainder of the bonus is based on each Director’s achievement of personal objectives, as
relevant to his or her role in the business.
The KPI targets associated with bonuses are specified at the beginning of each year and are
communicated to the Board. A sliding scale is applied to each element of the KPI targets, linked to
actual success in achieving targets.
The annual bonus is paid at the conclusion of each financial year. Bonuses can be clawed back for up
to two years in the event of specific conditions such as the discovery of a material error in the figures
upon which performance was assessed.
There is also a long-term incentive scheme for Executive Directors. This is also administered by the
Remuneration Committee. An amount of up to 300% of annual salary can be awarded in respect of
exceptional performance. In this context, ‘exceptional’ is defined in terms of the same measures as
the annual bonus, but with more demanding criteria, which are also predetermined at the start of
each year and communicated to the Directors. The long-term incentive takes the form of shares and
share options that are granted at the end of each year, but which do not vest until three years have
passed. Any unvested awards lapse when a Director leaves the company.
The Non-executive Directors receive an annual fee for their services, along with an additional fee for
participating in any Board committees. The level of fee is set at a level that attracts and retains good
people.
Sanje Lee and Dina Viraj do not receive any fees or salaries from Slide. Their remuneration is both
determined by and paid by Fouce.